Wednesday, 4 September 2013

Does the C++11 standard guarantee identical random numbers for the same seed across implementations?

Does the C++11 standard guarantee identical random numbers for the same
seed across implementations?

References

Reference NO 1

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13589215/does-the-c11-standard-guarantee-identical-random-numbers-for-the-same-seed-acr

Reference NO 2

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12450130/python-random-setstate-seed-is-there-guarantee-of-same-results-across-imp

Reference NO 3

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3551.pdf

Reference NO 4

http://weblog.bocoup.com/random-numbers/

Reference NO 5

http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_54_0/doc/html/boost_random/reference.html

Reference NO 6

http://www.walkingrandomly.com/?p=2755

Reference NO 7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudorandom_number_generator

Reference NO 8

#EANF#

No comments:

Post a Comment