Does the C++11 standard guarantee identical random numbers for the same
seed across implementations?
References
Reference NO 1
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13589215/does-the-c11-standard-guarantee-identical-random-numbers-for-the-same-seed-acr
Reference NO 2
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12450130/python-random-setstate-seed-is-there-guarantee-of-same-results-across-imp
Reference NO 3
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3551.pdf
Reference NO 4
http://weblog.bocoup.com/random-numbers/
Reference NO 5
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_54_0/doc/html/boost_random/reference.html
Reference NO 6
http://www.walkingrandomly.com/?p=2755
Reference NO 7
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudorandom_number_generator
Reference NO 8
#EANF#
No comments:
Post a Comment